Technology Yours, Find Newest Technology from GerardRibas
Posts tagged iphone

MacWorld
May 21st
Macworld is the biggest trade show and conference singularly focused on the Apple products platform. Described as a “Mecca for Mac users”, the Macworld Expo and Conference is a five-day event being held in San Francisco on February 9-13, 2010. Macworld draws every level of Apple fan-new users to Mac Power Users, creative experts to Enterprise professionals.
According to the Macworld Expo website, the expo component of the show “offers access to hundreds of Mac products and services, paired with expert advice, demonstrations and instruction”. The conference portion of the event features industry leaders presenting cutting edge product training and special presentations on the topics that Mac users most want to see.
Can the Macworld Expo Survive Without Apple?
When Apple announced last December that the 2009 Macworld Expo and Conference would the last Macworld event in which the company would participate, the news sent ripples though the Mac user community. Could the conference survive without Apple’s participation?
For years, Steve Jobs’ keynote presentation was perceived as the highlight of the trade show. Over the years, many of his keynote addresses were used to introduce the world to new and innovative products from Apple, such as: the iMac, PowerBook, Safari web browser, iTunes, iPod and the iPhone.
However, it appears that Apple’s decision to pull-out of the conference has not dampened the consumer demand for all things Apple. Even without Jobs’ keynote address and Apple’s presence on the trade show floor, registration numbers for the show are on track with previous years.
As to speculation on why they pulled out of the event, it seems that Apple is such a popular commodity that they feel that they don’t need to showcase their wares at Macworld and would do better in a situation where they could ultimately control the marketing message.
The buzz on the Internet indicated that both the Apple booth and Jobs’ keynote address were always so packed that it was almost impossible to get into either.
Mr. Smith Goes to San Francisco
Recently, IDG World Expo (the company that owns and runs the Macworld show) announced that filmmaker, actor, writer/director and admitted Mac enthusiast, Kevin Smith, would be hosting a Q&A presentation session as the show’s Feature Presenter. Smith, whose movies include Clerks, Chasing Amy, Dogma, Jersey Girl, Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back, is also well known for his irreverent, entertaining and animated storytelling style, where no topic is off limits, as shown in his documentary, An Evening with Kevin Smith.
By all accounts, Smith should do incredibly well. So well, that it might have Mac aficionados asking, “Steve who?”

i Touch
May 21st
In the hyper-competitive world of consumer electronics, is very unusual for a branded product to dominate the market for years and years. Yet this is what Apple’s iPod media player, now approaching its sixth anniversary, has succeeded in doing. One reason is that it’s been reinvented continuously.
The reinvention of the latest iPod line extends from three to four models, priced from $ 79 to $ 399, with capacities ranging from one gigabyte (approximately 240 songs) to 160 gigabytes (up to 40,000 songs.) And that does not count the iPhone , the long-awaited Apple phone, which also includes a full iPod.
I tested the new member of the iPod family, the big-screen iPod Touch. This is a close relative of the iPhone that connects to the Internet via Wi-Fi wireless network and replaces the famous iPod click wheel with touch screen. It starts at $ 299, $ 100 less than the iPhone, but with the same capacity of eight gigabytes. There is also a 16-gigabyte iPod Touch for $ 399.
Like earlier iPods, the Touch is elegant and capable, and works seamlessly with the free Apple iTunes for Windows and Macintosh computers, as well as with its computer-based iTunes online store, which sells songs downloaded and more TV shows of any other legal outlet.
Not only that, but the Touch introduces a mobile version of iTunes Store. It’s called the iTunes Wi-Fi Music Store, allowing you to buy, right on the iPod, one of the six million tracks for the same price you’d pay ‘in a computer. This archive will soon be made available on the portable iPhone.
For all its beauty and functionality, the Touch has some specific problems and negative aspects. It ‘s the first iPod model I’ve ever tried that fell significantly short, in my tests, the Apple claims the battery life. It ‘s also the first iPod that lacks any physical buttons for music playback control.
The Touch seems, at first glance, like an iPhone that you can not make phone calls. It is a beautiful, thin, a black rectangle with a huge 3.5 inch screen – the same size and resolution screen of the iPhone great. But the touch is even thinner and a bit ‘shorter.
Like the iPhone, the Touch has only one button on its face, a Home button that takes you to the main menu, a series of beautiful square icons. And, like the iPhone, the Touch has an on / off button along the top edge. Most everything else is controlled by Apple the new “multitouch” touch screen, which includes a virtual keyboard for entering text.
But unlike the iPhone, the Touch does not have volume control buttons and a button on his headset to pause or skip songs. So you have to play, pause and skip songs by touching the screen. This is facilitated by a feature the iPhone does not have (so far): If you double-click the Home button, music controls appear on screen, even if the screen is off. Still, you can not control your Touch by touch when you listen to music with the device in your pocket or purse.
In my tests, playing music and video went perfectly, and so did viewing photos. The Wi-Fi capabilities, including Web browser, a YouTube video viewer and the new mobile store, also worked perfectly.
The Touch is missing some Internet-oriented features from the iPhone that should work well over Wi-Fi. Missing e-mail to iPhone, mapping, monitoring of activities and programs of weather. But its keyboard has a feature the iPhone does not have: How about a BlackBerry, you can insert a point with a double-click the space bar.
Apple says the Touch was meant mainly to present typical iPod features, not to replicate the iPhone, and it included the Web browser only so users can get on Wi-Fi to use the mobile music store in certain places that required a log-in screen.
But it seems ridiculous to me to sell a powerful device with Wi-Fi and a huge screen, and leave things like an email program, even though you can e-mail programs use web-based. I assume Apple was concerned that the Touch might compete too much with less expensive than the iPhone if it had these features. In fact, if somebody can jam a voice-over-Internet capability into the iPod Touch, it might be a threat to the iPhone, which is tied to a single cellular carrier, AT & T.
The company claims that the Touch can play music for 22 hours and video up to five hours on a single battery charge, with Wi-Fi enabled. But in my tests, using factory settings, music playback lasted just under 17 hours and video playback lasted just over four hours. Almost all other iPod models I tried, including the new Nano, easily beat Apple battery claims.
In addition, some early iPod Touch units have had defective screens, where images appeared too dark. Apple says this problem affected a small number of units and solves the problem. My two test units displayed beautiful images.
Despite these downsides, the Touch is a great media player, and the iPod remains the best end-to-end laptop to play and buy music and video.

Apple TV
May 20th
The biggest announcement at Apple’s Sep music outcome this afternoon was just marginally about music . Jobs sent for it his “one more rocking horse” divulge , a book of facts to his earlier comments about Apple TV as a hobby for the company. The new Apple TV that comes out in four hebdomads should turn the device and platform into far more than just a hobbyhorse for Apple. It is now importantly smaller than premature renderings (about 1 4 the size) and drastically cheaper at only $ 99. It is a far simpler machine, with no intragroup computer storage and a rental-only framework for leverages. The new Orchard apple tree TV is likewise far more flexible and capable . It can watercourse picture shows , euphony and photos from computing machines on the net , as well as from iOS devices such as the iPad, iPhone and iPod Touch (which, now that Apple as well announced a touchscreen iPod Nano today, appears miscalled) through Apple ‘s AirPlay. There is also entree to online message from Flickr, YouTube and, most significantly , Netflix.
Apple TV is intelligibly a more desirable production directly , with a no brainer price , as well as cheaper rentals of TV shows ( nowadays , instead of $ 2.99 per episode, it will be merely 99 centsalthough currently solely ABC and Fox have signed on). But is it revolutionary? Clearly the raining buckets from iOS devices is rattling cool for iCentric homes . I can merely envisage the Apple-idealized iCouple sitting on their Design Within Reach couch in a Noe Valley townhouse fighting over whose device should be pouring to the Orchard apple tree TV (Her : “I want to flow Nick and Norah’s Infinite Playlist from my iPad” ; Him : “I want to flow The Squid and the Whale! from my iPhone!”) . In time I ‘m all the same a bit surprised that Jobs did n’t demand a bit more from this device, given its likely to rightfully expand the iOS line .
In fact, it appears the device is coursing the same old Apple TV OS as in front. Obviously , the Apple TV is not a touchscreen device ( ideate how nettling that would be), indeed iOS would be an awkward port to Apple TV. But because it is n’t iOS-based, the Apple TV pretermits out on the potential difference for thousands of apps and a creative developer network that could greatly enlarge its powerfulness and solicitation . But thinka $ 99 gaming device based on smart phone architecture! It would have directly undercut the integral console table marketplus, they could have made iPod Touches and iPhones the controls. That could get expensive quick, but you can see the potential.
In fact, as it is, the Apple TV is fundamentally a gaming console without the gaming. Most of what it doesstreaming TV, medicine and exposures , plus leases and Netflixcan already be done on an Xbox 360 or PlayStation 3. But that may not be such a wicked theme . It’s about half the damage of the cheapest console , and it should invoke in a nice way to the non-gamer with its simple interface and unobtrusive invention .
That said, if this is Malus pumila’s hobbyhorse , I ‘m yet not sure they ‘re finished tinkering with the platform. I amply anticipate an iOS box exploiting into the TV in the near future.

































